CrossCurrents A Catholic Reflects on Faith in Our Times
Bernard
F. Swain, Ph.D. www.CrossCurrents.us
The Truth of Peace
Like many American Catholics, I have
been anxious to form a clear impression of our new Pope. Joseph RatzingerÕs reputation as
reformer-turned-reactionary-turned-Vatican-watchdog gave me, like many others,
grave misgivings about the kind of papacy Benedict XVI might have in store for
us. ItÕs still too early to be definitive (the PopeÕs first encyclical letter,
which is due out soon, may shape his image more sharply), but as we begin the
new year I am at least happy to report one hopeful sign: Benedict XVIÕs January
1 message for World Day of Peace.
Many Catholics hardly noticed when the
feast of the ÒCircumcision of the LordÓ was dropped as the Holy Day observed on
January 1. But the eventual change
to ÒWorld Day of PeaceÓ fits perfectly with the agenda of John XXIII, Pope Paul
VI and John Paul II, all of whom saw peacemaking as a major priority for the Catholic
Church in our time.
Calling his predecessors Òastute promoters
of peace,Ó Benedict makes their peace agenda his own, and declares his
intention to follow the path they set, in order to show Òthe steadfast resolve
of the Holy See to continue serving the cause of peace.Ó He even says he chose
his name with peace in mind: first thinking of St. Benedict who, as patron
saint of Europe, Òinspired a civilization of peace,Ó but especially for Pope
Benedict XV, famous for condemning World War I as Òuseless slaughter.Ó
Benedict takes his theme from Vatican II,
which said our hopes for a better world depend on a humanity that is Òrenewed
in spirit and converted to the truth of peace.Ó The rest of the PopeÕs message
spells out his understanding of what Òtruth of peaceÓ really means.
He reminds his readers that peace is not
merely the absence of conflict, and quotes the fuller 1917 definition of
Benedict XV that peace is Òthe fruit of an orderÉ which must be brought about
by humanity in its thirst for ever more perfect justice.Ó He also quotes St.
Augustine defining peace as Òthe tranquility of order.Ó For his part, the
PopeÕs conviction is that Òthe foundations of authentic piece rest on the truth
about God and man.Ó In his view, any threat to truth is also a threat to peace,
so we face several challenges if we Catholics are proclaim the Gospel of Peace:
Overcoming the Lies in Our Time. Benedict clearly blames the 20th centuryÕs
horrific death toll on the Òbig liesÓ that dominated so many people, when Òaberrant
ideological and political systems willfully twisted the truth and brought about
the exploitation and murder of an appalling number of men and women, wiping out
entire families and communities.Ó The Pope is referring, of course, to forces
like imperialism, fascism, Nazism, Soviet communism. But he takes these, not merely
as past history, but as lessons for the future, and urges all women and men to
be vigilant against contemporary lies which he calls Òthe framework for
menacing scenarios of death in many parts of the world.Ó
Overcoming Cultural arrogance. I was impressed by BenedictÕs view of peace as an
interior yearning that is universal among people, regardless of their
particular cultural identities. In fact, he sees the insistence on oneÕs unique
identity as an obstacle on the common path to peace:
All people are members of one and the
same family. An extreme exultation of differences clashes with this fundamental
truth. We need to regain an awareness that we share a common destiny which is
ultimately transcendent so as to maximize our historical and cultural
differences, not in opposition to, but in cooperation with, people belonging to
other cultures. These simple truths
are what make peace possible.
Here Benedict reaffirms his predecessorsÕ
call to all Catholics to become ÒCitizens of the World.Ó
Embracing International Law. Benedict repeats his predecessorsÕ conviction that
both the prevention and the conduct of war must rest on a legal foundation:
International humanitarian law ought to
be considered as one of the finest and most effective expressions of the
intrinsic demands of the truth of peace. Precisely for this reason, respect for
the law must be considered binding on all peoples. Its value must be
appreciated and its correct application ensured; it must also be brought up to
date by precise norms applicable to the changing scenarios of todayÕs armed
conflicts and the use of ever newer and more sophisticated weapons.
BenedictÕs position clashes directly, of
course, with the US rejection of the International Criminal Court.
Rejecting Faith-Based Fanatiscism. Benedict
acknowledges terrorism as a major source of violence, and points out that
previous popes saw terrorism growing out of hopelessness, and that sometimes
hopeless people turned desperately to false hopes:
Religious fanaticism, today often
labeled fundamentalism, can inspire and encourage terrorist thinking and
activity. From the beginning, John Paul II was aware of the explosive danger
represented by fanatical fundamentalism, and he condemned it unsparingly.
Holding Authorities Accountable. After citing some contemporary hopeful signs, the Pope
warns against Òna•ve optimismÓ by focusing his attention on the way world
governments impede peace. He includes policies that create hostility to other
nations, policies that maintain nuclear arsenals or create new ones, and
policies that support Òcontinuing growth in military expenditure and the
flourishing arms trade.Ó He also charges that, meanwhile, efforts to disarm are
Òbogged down in general indifference.Ó
As the worldÕs #1 arms dealer and #1 nuclear
arsenal, the US is a clear (though unnamed) target of BenedictÕs critique here.
Partnership with the UN. This might be the most controversial of all the PopeÕs
points, but it too merely repeats and reaffirms his predecessorsÕ work. Americans
tend to be conditioned to a negative view of the UN, but the Vatican has
consistently championed the organization for more than 40 years, and here
Benedict is no exception. Indeed the UN is the only governmental body the Pope
refers to by name:
The Catholic Church, while confirming
her confidence in this international body, calls for the institutional and
operative renewal which would enable it to respond to the changing needs of the
present time...The United Nations Organization must become a more efficient
instrument for promoting the values of justice, solidarity and peace in the
world.
So while Benedict acknowledges the need
for UN reform, he repeats Paul VIÕs 1965 call for a partnership between the UN
and the Catholic Church.
Why am I so encouraged when I read all of
these points from the PopeÕs message?
ÒPeaceÓ has been a common theme crossing
all the differences between the last three popes. What John XXIII began with his
encyclical ÒPacem in Terris,Ó and Paul VI continued with his ÒNo More War!Ó UN speech in 1965, John Paul II
extended by speaking of a ÒPeace Church.Ó With Benedict XVI, I feared that
common theme might be lost. But his World Day of Peace message makes it crystal
clear that our new Pope embraces with enthusiasm the last 40 years of papal
activism on behalf of peace.
In that respect, at least, Benedict XVI is
not turning the clock back to an earlier era of Catholic life. Instead, he is
picking up the torch for the renewal of the ChurchÕs Peace mission, and holding
its light high. My hope is that
American Catholics, though immersed in a culture that celebrates war and
rejects most of the ChurchÕs peace doctrine, will soon see the light.
© Bernard F. Swain PhD 2006
Send Your Comments and Questions to bfswain@juno.com
Dr. SwainÕs
opinions do not represent the views of this parish or any other official body.
Bernie Swain has
devoted more than 30 years to adult spiritual formation in dioceses in the US,
Canada, and France. Since 1991 he has maintained a private practice as trainer,
teacher, and consultant to leaders in parishes and other religious
organizations. He holds degrees in theology and political science from Holy
Cross, Harvard, The University of Paris, and The University of Chicago.
His writings include Liberating
Leadership (Harper & Row,
1986) and more than 200 articles in periodicals such as The National Catholic
Reporter, Commonweal, The Miami Herald, The Catholic Free Press, The Pilot,
Harvard Theological Review, and
Liturgy.
A lifelong layperson,
he lives in Boston with his wife and three children. Visit his website at:
CrossCurrents
Is a weekly subscription
service for parish websites.
Individual Subscriptions
are also available.
For Information, contact bfswain@juno or call 617-282-0183